Warrantless Pole-Camera Surveillance by Police is Dangerous. The

We’re calling on the court to clarify that long-term police use of a surveillance camera targeted at a person’s home is a Fourth Amendment search.

Warrantless Pole-Camera Surveillance by Police is Dangerous. The Supreme Court Can Stop It.

Facial Recognition - CCLA

Surveillance Applications (Part II) - The Cambridge Handbook of Surveillance Law

Electronic Frontier Foundation News and Opinion

VISUAL] The Overlapping Infrastructure of Urban Surveillance, and How to Fix It

Is It Illegal to Record Someone Without Their Permission?

Digital is Different: “Pole Camera” Ruling Demonstrates Evolving Fourth Amendment Rights - Center for Democracy and Technology

s disturbing plan to add face surveillance to your front door

Sophia M-G (@SMayottGuerrero) / X

Supreme Court leaves warrantless video surveillance open • The Register

Drones and aerial surveillance: Considerations for legislatures

CQ Researcher - High-Tech Policing

Pol 153 - ACLU Wessler Privacy Rights - University of California, Davis